Irving Petlin: Pastel, Protest & the Art of Bearing Witness

“Joseph and His Houses” (1981) | Irving Petlin

Irving Petlin made pictures that can feel as though they are emerging from memory just before they disappear again. Figures hover inside pale landscapes. Bodies dissolve into dusty fields of color. Buildings, forests, animals, and fragments of architecture appear without fully explaining themselves. Even when his subject was a recognizable historical event, Petlin rarely approached it like a reporter recording facts. He transformed experience into allegory, dream, and haunting visual memory.

Born in Chicago on December 17, 1934, Petlin became one of the most distinctive American figurative artists of the postwar era. He was particularly celebrated for his mastery of pastel, a medium he treated not as preparation for painting but as a serious and demanding art form in its own right. At a time when abstraction dominated much of the American art world, Petlin remained committed to the human figure and to art’s ability to confront history, suffering, literature, memory, and political violence.

His life moved between Chicago, Paris, Los Angeles, New York, and Martha’s Vineyard, placing him in several of the most important artistic and political circles of the second half of the 20th century. Along the way he became associated with Chicago’s Monster Roster, studied with Josef Albers at Yale, witnessed deadly political violence in Paris, helped organize artists against the Vietnam War, collaborated on one of the era’s most famous protest posters, and produced a deeply personal body of work inspired by writers including Primo Levi, Paul Celan, Bruno Schulz, and Edmond Jabès.

🎨 Growing Up With Art in Chicago

Petlin was born to Polish Jewish immigrant parents and grew up in Chicago, where art entered his life early. He attended children’s classes at the Art Institute of Chicago before later studying formally at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago during the 1950s.

Chicago provided a particularly fertile environment for an artist interested in the human figure.

While Abstract Expressionism was becoming enormously influential in New York, a number of Chicago artists continued creating intense, psychologically charged figurative art. Painters such as Leon Golub, Nancy Spero, Seymour Rosofsky, and others eventually became associated with a group critic Franz Schulze nicknamed the Monster Roster.

Petlin was younger than many of the central figures, but the Smart Museum of Art includes him within the group’s extended circle and emphasizes the importance of his early paintings and pastels to its figurative tradition. Petlin himself recalled experimenting with abstraction before deciding that something essential was missing: the presence of human beings.

That commitment to figuration would remain with him for the rest of his career.

🧑‍🎨 Yale & Josef Albers

After Chicago, Petlin received a fellowship to study at Yale University, where one of his teachers was the enormously influential artist and educator Josef Albers.

On the surface, they might seem like an unlikely pairing.

Albers was famous for his rigorous investigations of geometric abstraction and color relationships, particularly the paintings that became his Homage to the Square series. Petlin was moving toward symbolic, figurative imagery filled with ambiguous characters and psychological tension.

Yet Albers encouraged experimentation, and Petlin later remembered that the older artist responded positively to some of his color studies even though their artistic directions were very different.

Petlin’s years at Yale were interrupted when he was drafted into the U.S. Army in 1957. Stationed at the Presidio in San Francisco, he continued painting at night and exhibited at the Dilexi Gallery before finishing his graduate work.

Following his military service, he made a decision that would change his art dramatically.

He went to Paris.

🇫🇷 Paris & the Discovery of Pastel

Paris placed Petlin in direct contact with European modernism and with artists whose work seemed naturally compatible with his own growing interest in symbolism and dream imagery. He encountered figures including Roberto Matta and moved within a world where Surrealism, Symbolism, postwar figuration, and literary culture overlapped.

During a trip to southern France around 1960, something equally important happened.

Petlin discovered what pastel could do.

While watching preparations associated with bullfighting near Arles, he began drawing the people, animals, dust, and intense southern light around him. Pastel seemed uniquely capable of holding all of those sensations together.

In a lengthy 2016 oral history with the Smithsonian’s Archives of American Art, Petlin recalled realizing that pastel wasn’t merely useful for sketching. It could become his primary medium. His earliest major pastel works emerged around this time, and he continued working with the material throughout his career.

For Petlin, pastel had a peculiar combination of delicacy and intensity.

Pigment sits directly on the surface rather than disappearing beneath varnish or layers of paint. Colors can glow, blur, accumulate, or seem almost ready to blow away.

That physical fragility suited the imagery he wanted to create.

🌫️ Figures Between Dream & Memory

Petlin’s pictures are populated, but his figures often resist clear identification.

A person may appear only as a shadow or fragment. Bodies merge with landscapes. Objects float in uncertain spaces. A forest may feel simultaneously real and psychological.

This ambiguity connects Petlin with Symbolist artists such as Odilon Redon, whose work he admired, as well as with Surrealism and the psychologically intense figurative art he encountered in Chicago.

Yet Petlin’s dream imagery rarely feels escapist.

Something has happened in these places.

Something has been remembered—or lost.

That quality became increasingly important as Petlin began responding to historical events. Rather than illustrating those events directly, he allowed them to enter his visual world as memory, metaphor, and disturbance.

🚇 Hundred Fighting Men

One of the pivotal events of Petlin’s life occurred in Paris in February 1962.

France was nearing the end of the Algerian War, and political tensions were intense. Petlin became caught up in events surrounding a demonstration against the far-right Organisation armée secrète and the Algerian conflict. At the Charonne Métro station, police violence resulted in the deaths of nine demonstrators.

Petlin witnessed the violence firsthand.

The experience led to his series Hundred Fighting Men, in which bodies appear compressed into a chaotic mass of conflict. The works marked an important shift in his art. Historical events were no longer simply happening outside the studio; they had entered his imagery.

Yet Hundred Fighting Men wasn’t documentary illustration.

The figures twist together within claustrophobic spaces, becoming almost mythological representations of violence itself.

That approach would characterize much of Petlin’s politically engaged art.

He responded to specific events but searched within them for something larger about human behavior.

🇺🇸 Returning to a Changing America

Petlin could have remained in France. His career was developing there, and he and his wife, poet Sarah Petlin, had established a life in Europe.

But the United States was entering a period of profound upheaval.

The Civil Rights Movement, racial violence, the Vietnam War, student protest, and political confrontation increasingly commanded Petlin’s attention. In his Smithsonian oral history, he remembered feeling that remaining abroad while these events unfolded would somehow be wrong for him.

After returning to the United States, Petlin spent time in Los Angeles and became increasingly involved in artist-led opposition to the Vietnam War.

His art and activism were related, but they weren’t identical.

Petlin didn’t believe that every painting had to function like a political placard. Instead, he maintained a studio practice filled with mystery and metaphor while also participating directly in collective political projects outside the studio.

That distinction became crucial to his career.

🔥 The Burning of Los Angeles

Los Angeles provided Petlin with another major subject.

His monumental multipart painting The Burning of Los Angeles, created during the mid-1960s, responded to the social tensions he observed in the city around the period of the 1965 Watts uprising.

Rather than rendering the event as straightforward reportage, Petlin constructed an enormous, almost apocalyptic vision.

The title itself transforms a contemporary city into the setting of an ancient catastrophe.

This ability to move between current events and timeless imagery is one of Petlin’s defining characteristics. A protest, riot, war, or disappearance could become part of a larger meditation on destruction, memory, and human vulnerability.

The Burning of Los Angeles eventually entered the collection of the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. The Whitney Museum identifies it among the important works created as Petlin’s engagement with American political life intensified.

☮️ The Artists’ Protest Committee & the Peace Tower

Petlin’s political involvement became especially visible during the Vietnam War.

While in California, he became a principal organizer of the Artists’ Protest movement against the war and helped establish the Artists’ Protest Committee.

In 1966, he worked with sculptor Mark di Suvero and numerous other artists to create one of the most memorable artist-led protests of the decade: the Peace Tower in Los Angeles.

The approximately 60-foot steel structure functioned as a framework upon which hundreds of artists contributed individual works opposing the war. Contributions came from artists around the world, turning the tower into a collective statement rather than the work of a single person.

Petlin conceived and organized the project with collaborators that included di Suvero and members of the Los Angeles art community. The Smithsonian Archives of American Art preserves materials connected with the Peace Tower among Petlin’s papers.

The project also raised a question that would continue to follow politically engaged artists throughout the era:

What could art actually do in the face of war?

The Peace Tower offered one answer.

Artists could act together.

📰 And Babies

Petlin later participated in an artwork that became one of the most disturbing visual documents of the antiwar movement.

Following revelations about the My Lai massacre, members of the Art Workers’ Coalition created the poster commonly known as ** Q. And babies? A. And babies. **

The poster combined a photograph taken by U.S. Army photographer Ronald Haeberle showing victims of the massacre with text drawn from a television interview concerning the killings.

Petlin worked on the project with Jon Hendricks and Frazer Dougherty. Plans initially involved cooperation with the Museum of Modern Art, but the museum ultimately declined to associate itself officially with the poster. The Art Workers’ Coalition proceeded independently, distributing approximately 50,000 copies.

The image became one of the best-known protest posters of the Vietnam era.

Its visual strategy could hardly have been further from Petlin’s mysterious pastels. There is little ambiguity. The photograph confronts the viewer directly.

That difference demonstrates how Petlin separated his collaborative activism from his personal studio practice.

Sometimes art could whisper.

Sometimes it had to shout.

🟡 Making Pastel Monumental

Meanwhile, Petlin continued pushing pastel far beyond its traditional associations.

Pastel had long been associated with portraits, intimate drawings, and preparatory studies. Petlin treated it as capable of carrying imagery every bit as complex and ambitious as oil painting.

He worked on substantial sheets of paper, layering tiny marks and clouds of pigment into surfaces that could seem simultaneously dense and weightless.

A 1973 pastel now held by the Smithsonian American Art Museum demonstrates this approach. Its classification as an imaginary landscape is revealing: Petlin’s spaces often resemble landscapes without behaving according to ordinary geography.

His pastel world could contain recognizable elements—a tree, house, figure, pathway, table, animal, or boat—yet their relationship remained uncertain.

They seemed less like things observed than things remembered.

📚 Painting in Conversation With Literature

Literature became increasingly important to Petlin’s work.

He was particularly drawn to writers whose work dealt with memory, catastrophe, exile, identity, and the fragility of human existence. Among them were Primo Levi, Paul Celan, Bruno Schulz, Edmond Jabès, and Michael Palmer.

These weren’t casual references.

Petlin frequently developed bodies of work in series, allowing a subject or writer to occupy his imagination over an extended period.

That method suited his art perfectly.

Instead of trying to arrive at a single definitive image, Petlin could circle a subject repeatedly. One picture might lead to another. Characters might reappear. Landscapes might mutate. Fragments could migrate between works.

The process resembles memory itself.

We rarely remember an experience once and identically.

We return to it.

Each return changes it slightly.

🕯️ Jewish Memory & the Lost World of Europe

As Petlin grew older, his Jewish heritage became increasingly central to his imagery.

The son of Polish Jewish immigrants, he began looking more deeply toward the cultural world that had been devastated during the Holocaust. Writers such as Bruno Schulz, Primo Levi, and Paul Celan provided important points of connection.

His pictures did not attempt to reconstruct that vanished world realistically.

Instead, memory arrived through fragments.

A figure might appear alone beneath a pale sky. A building could resemble both a home and a ruin. A landscape might carry the emotional weight of a place without corresponding to any actual geography.

Petlin’s own family history and the broader destruction of European Jewish life overlapped with his longstanding interest in disappearance.

The past wasn’t safely finished.

It remained present in traces.

👤 The Disappeared

That concern with absence also appears in Petlin’s response to political violence outside Europe.

His 1985 painting ** The Disappeared ** confronts the thousands of people abducted and killed during Argentina’s military dictatorship of the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts describes the work as filled with ominous imagery, including a ghostly landscape and distressed human figure. PAFA also connects the painting to Petlin’s broader engagement with writers and with international political events.

Once again, the subject is specific.

But the painting doesn’t function as a diagram of what happened.

It communicates the terror of not knowing.

Someone has vanished.

The world remains.

That absence becomes the subject.

🌳 Paris, New York & Martha’s Vineyard

Petlin’s life continued to move between places.

He and Sarah spent nearly three decades in New York before eventually returning to Paris, fulfilling a promise Petlin had made years earlier when they left France.

In his later decades, he divided much of his time between Paris and the family’s old farmhouse on Martha’s Vineyard.

The geography suited an artist whose entire career had existed between American and European traditions.

Chicago had given him powerful figurative art.

Yale had given him Albers and formal experimentation.

Paris had given him pastel, literary culture, and European modernism.

Los Angeles had placed him inside one of America’s most active artistic protest movements.

New York connected him to the political and artistic struggles surrounding museums, artists’ organizations, and the changing art world of the 1960s and 1970s.

He carried pieces of all of these places into his work.

🎭 Neither Realism Nor Abstraction

Petlin is difficult to place neatly inside a single movement.

He wasn’t a traditional realist.

He wasn’t an Abstract Expressionist.

He wasn’t exactly a Surrealist, despite the dreamlike qualities of his imagery.

He wasn’t simply a political artist, either.

That difficulty is part of what makes his work so interesting.

During decades when American art history was often narrated as a succession of movements—Abstract Expressionism, Pop Art, Minimalism, Conceptual Art—Petlin continued building a private figurative language filled with ghosts, travelers, landscapes, memories, animals, political violence, and literary echoes.

His figures never disappeared completely.

Even when they became tiny, translucent, or nearly swallowed by their surroundings, someone remained in the picture.

🖼️ An Artist Who Believed History Was Personal

Petlin once expressed an idea that could serve as a key to his entire career: an individual’s life story belongs to a larger history.

His paintings repeatedly move between those two scales.

A private memory connects with the Holocaust.

A figure in a landscape connects with exile.

A street demonstration becomes Hundred Fighting Men.

Los Angeles becomes a burning city.

The disappearance of individuals in Argentina becomes an almost mythological landscape of absence.

Political events matter because they happen to actual human beings.

And private memories matter because they exist within history.

That may explain why Petlin resisted purely abstract art so strongly as a young man.

He wanted someone to remain there looking back.

✨ The Lasting Art of Irving Petlin

Irving Petlin continued working late into his life. He died on September 1, 2018, at the age of 83, leaving behind paintings, pastels, prints, collaborative political works, and decades of drawings and studies. His papers are preserved by the Smithsonian’s Archives of American Art, while his work can be found in major museum collections including the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Museum of Modern Art, and the Smithsonian American Art Museum.

Yet museum collections and political history tell only part of his story.

Petlin’s greatest achievement may have been maintaining the delicate strangeness of his own visual language through decades of enormous cultural change.

His pastels are fragile without being weak.

His figures are mysterious without becoming meaningless.

His political work is engaged without turning his entire career into propaganda.

And his images of memory often seem to exist somewhere between remembering and forgetting.

Irving Petlin spent much of his life asking what an artist should do with history.

His answer was not simply to record it.

He allowed history to pass through memory, literature, imagination, and the human figure until it emerged transformed on the other side.

🔗 Related Articles

📚 Sources & Further Reading

Leave a Reply